Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
Track and monitor the costs and profits of your products with the customizable Cost of Goods Sold for WooCommerce extension.
| Cost of Goods Sold | WooCommerce Product Search | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | — | — |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
The perfect Search Engine helps customers to find and buy products quickly – essential for every WooCommerce store.
| Metric | Cost of Goods Sold | WooCommerce Product Search |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 195 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | ★ $49/year | $59/year |
Based on the data on this page, WooCommerce Product Search is the stronger choice for most WooCommerce Marketplace store owners — 4.3★ vs Cost of Goods Sold's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing sits in similar territory: Cost of Goods Sold at $49/year, WooCommerce Product Search at $59/year (within ~25% of each other on the entry tier). At this overlap, total cost of ownership comes from how per-tier capacity gates align with your order volume — confirm both apps' upgrade triggers against your projected scale before deciding.
WooCommerce Product Search has the larger user base (195 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Cost of Goods Sold's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage store owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WooCommerce Product Search; mid-market and enterprise store owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Cost of Goods Sold's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WooCommerce Product Search's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical WooCommerce Marketplace listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cost of Goods Sold audit • WooCommerce Product Search audit
| Keyword | Cost of Goods Sold | WooCommerce Product Search |
|---|---|---|
| payment | #590 | #87 |
| form | #590 | #87 |
Both Cost of Goods Sold and WooCommerce Product Search offer paid plans only. Cost of Goods Sold starts at $49/year; WooCommerce Product Search starts at $59/year. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating, because neither publishes one. WooCommerce Product Search does carry the larger published review base (195 vs 0). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the WooCommerce Marketplace. WooCommerce Product Search has the deeper published review base (195 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cost of Goods Sold typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). WooCommerce Product Search typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (195 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cost of Goods Sold and WooCommerce Product Search both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Cost of Goods Sold" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.