Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| View Reviews Page | Google Reviews - Designers cut | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | View Reviews Page | Google Reviews - Designers cut |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 10 | 3 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Google Reviews - Designers cut edges out View Reviews Page on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: View Reviews Page at Free plan available, Google Reviews - Designers cut at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Google Reviews - Designers cut; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — View Reviews Page's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google Reviews - Designers cut's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: View Reviews Page audit • Google Reviews - Designers cut audit
| Keyword | View Reviews Page | Google Reviews - Designers cut |
|---|---|---|
| google review | #15 | #4833 |
| google reviews | #15 | #4833 |
| import existing reviews | #35 | #33 |
| reviews into | #37 | #34 |
| display reviews | #37 | #34 |
Both View Reviews Page and Google Reviews - Designers cut offer paid plans only. View Reviews Page starts at Free plan available; Google Reviews - Designers cut starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Google Reviews - Designers cut has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to View Reviews Page (4.8★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Google Reviews - Designers cut holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. View Reviews Page has the deeper published review base (10 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
View Reviews Page typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). Google Reviews - Designers cut typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. View Reviews Page and Google Reviews - Designers cut both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google Reviews - Designers cut" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
