Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| UTM Catcher | Web-Stat Visitor Analytics | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | UTM Catcher | Web-Stat Visitor Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 13 | ★ 458 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
Based on the data on this page, UTM Catcher is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Web-Stat Visitor Analytics's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: UTM Catcher at Free plan available, Web-Stat Visitor Analytics at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Web-Stat Visitor Analytics has the larger user base (458 reviews vs 13), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. UTM Catcher's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to UTM Catcher; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Web-Stat Visitor Analytics's 458-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than UTM Catcher's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: UTM Catcher audit • Web-Stat Visitor Analytics audit
| — |
| Keyword | UTM Catcher | Web-Stat Visitor Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| receive | #37 | #3 |
| analytics | #44 | #2 |
| tracking | #3 | #47 |
| traffic | #42 | #37 |
Both UTM Catcher and Web-Stat Visitor Analytics offer paid plans only. UTM Catcher starts at Free plan available; Web-Stat Visitor Analytics starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
UTM Catcher has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 13 reviews) compared to Web-Stat Visitor Analytics (4.5★ from 458 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. UTM Catcher fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Web-Stat Visitor Analytics is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Web-Stat Visitor Analytics has more onboarding documentation maturity (458 reviews vs 13), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
UTM Catcher typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (13 reviews). Web-Stat Visitor Analytics aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (458 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. UTM Catcher and Web-Stat Visitor Analytics both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from UTM Catcher" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
