Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Back to Top Button | UserWay Accessibility | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Back to Top Button | UserWay Accessibility |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 5 | ★ 25 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 36 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Back to Top Button is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs UserWay Accessibility's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Back to Top Button at Free, UserWay Accessibility at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Back to Top Button; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — UserWay Accessibility's 25-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Back to Top Button's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Back to Top Button audit • UserWay Accessibility audit
| — |
| Keyword | Back to Top Button | UserWay Accessibility |
|---|---|---|
| users to | #8 | #19 |
| menu | #33 | #20 |
| menus | #33 | #20 |
| menu management | #44 | #28 |
No tracked changes.
Both Back to Top Button and UserWay Accessibility offer paid plans only. Back to Top Button starts at Free; UserWay Accessibility starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Back to Top Button has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to UserWay Accessibility (4.0★ from 25 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Back to Top Button fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; UserWay Accessibility is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. UserWay Accessibility has more onboarding documentation maturity (25 reviews vs 5), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Back to Top Button typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (5 reviews). UserWay Accessibility aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (25 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Back to Top Button and UserWay Accessibility both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Back to Top Button" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
