Loading content…
LinkedIn Button vs Talk
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| LinkedIn Button | Talk | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LinkedIn Button | Talk | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | LinkedIn Button: Ichonic | Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 12 | 0 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 49 supported |
Based on the data on this page, LinkedIn Button: Ichonic is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI offers a free tier (Free plan available) while LinkedIn Button: Ichonic starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to LinkedIn Button: Ichonic; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LinkedIn Button: Ichonic's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LinkedIn Button: Ichonic audit • Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI audit
| Keyword | LinkedIn Button | Talk |
|---|---|---|
| #2 | Not ranked | |
| instant | #6 | Not ranked |
| voice | Not ranked | #7 |
| call | Not ranked | #17 |
| calls | Not ranked | #17 |
No tracked changes.
Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). LinkedIn Button: Ichonic starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
LinkedIn Button: Ichonic holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. LinkedIn Button: Ichonic has the deeper published review base (12 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
LinkedIn Button: Ichonic typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (12 reviews). Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LinkedIn Button: Ichonic and Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Talk: Live Voice Chat with AI" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.