Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Size Charts | Table Master | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Size Charts | Table Master |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.5 ★ | 2.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 24 | ★ 780 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Size Charts is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.5★ vs Table Master's 2.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Size Charts offers a free tier (Free) while Table Master starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Table Master has the larger user base (780 reviews vs 24), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Size Charts's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Size Charts; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Table Master's 780-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Size Charts's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Size Charts audit • Table Master audit
| Keyword | Size Charts | Table Master |
|---|---|---|
| sheets table | #21 | #2 |
| size chart | #1 | #23 |
| size charts | #1 | #23 |
| chart size guides | #1 | #24 |
| price table | #25 | #2 |
No tracked changes.
Size Charts is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Table Master starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Size Charts has the higher average rating (4.5★ from 24 reviews) compared to Table Master (2.6★ from 780 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Size Charts fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Table Master is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Table Master has more onboarding documentation maturity (780 reviews vs 24), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Size Charts typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (24 reviews). Table Master aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (780 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Size Charts and Table Master both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Size Charts" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
