Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer | Video | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer | Video |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 34 | 6 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 5 supported |
SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer and Video are evenly matched on rating (4.9★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow. Pricing entry tiers: SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer at Paid, Video at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort of orders for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most merchants the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer audit • Video audit
| Keyword | SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer | Video |
|---|---|---|
| 3d design | #4 | Not ranked |
| zoom | #10 | Not ranked |
| courses | Not ranked | #18 |
| beautifully | Not ranked | #21 |
| bring | #24 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Both SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer and Video offer paid plans only. SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer starts at Paid; Video starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer (4.9★, 34 reviews) and Video (5.0★, 6 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Video is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer has more onboarding documentation maturity (34 reviews vs 6), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (34 reviews). Video aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (6 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer and Video both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Video" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
