Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| 123 Form Builder & Payments | SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | 123 Form Builder & Payments | SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 5k | 34 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Review velocity (30d) | 1 new | — |
| Languages | 7 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.9★ vs 123 Form Builder & Payments's 4.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, 123 Form Builder & Payments offers a free tier (Free plan available) while SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
123 Form Builder & Payments has the larger user base (4,961 reviews vs 34), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — 123 Form Builder & Payments's 4,961-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: 123 Form Builder & Payments audit • SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer audit
| — |
| Keyword | 123 Form Builder & Payments | SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer |
|---|---|---|
| payment form builder | #1 | Not ranked |
| builder | #2 | Not ranked |
| payment form | #2 | Not ranked |
| virtual | Not ranked | #2 |
| 3d design | Not ranked | #4 |
| Signal | 123 Form Builder & Payments | SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer |
|---|---|---|
| Average rating | 4.4 ★ (5k) | 4.9 ★ (34) |
| Rating distribution | 5100% 40% 30% 20% 10% | 5— 4— 3— 2— 1— |
| Reviews · last 7 days | +1 | — |
| Reviews · last 30 days | +1 | — |
| Reviews · last 90 days | +1 | — |
123 Form Builder & Payments is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 34 reviews) compared to 123 Form Builder & Payments (4.4★ from 4,961 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. 123 Form Builder & Payments has the deeper published review base (4,961 vs 34), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
123 Form Builder & Payments typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (4,961 reviews). SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (34 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Goeie app!
I definitely recommend this app !
Super Easy to Use
No reviews yet.
Migration support varies by app and category. 123 Form Builder & Payments and SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from SwiftXR (3D/AR/VR) Viewer" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
