Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Square Integration | syncX | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Square Integration | syncX: Stock Sync |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | 11 | ★ 24 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 4 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Square Integration is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs syncX: Stock Sync's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, syncX: Stock Sync offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Square Integration starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Square Integration; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — syncX: Stock Sync's 24-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Square Integration's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Square Integration audit • syncX: Stock Sync audit
| Keyword | Square Integration | syncX |
|---|---|---|
| sync | #5 | #36 |
| inventory | #46 | #4 |
| weather updates | #42 | #8 |
| import | #4 | #48 |
| sync contacts | #40 | #16 |
No tracked changes.
syncX: Stock Sync is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Square Integration starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Square Integration has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 11 reviews) compared to syncX: Stock Sync (4.1★ from 24 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Square Integration holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. syncX: Stock Sync has the deeper published review base (24 vs 11), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Square Integration typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). syncX: Stock Sync typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (24 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Square Integration and syncX: Stock Sync both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Square Integration" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
