Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Social Proof with Fomo | Team | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Social Proof with Fomo | Team |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 14 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 9 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Team is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Social Proof with Fomo's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Social Proof with Fomo offers a free tier (Free) while Team starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Team; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Social Proof with Fomo's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Team's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Social Proof with Fomo audit • Team audit
| — |
| Keyword | Social Proof with Fomo | Team |
|---|---|---|
| trust | #8 | #48 |
| trust badges | #47 | #283 |
No tracked changes.
Social Proof with Fomo is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Team starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Team holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Team has the deeper published review base (14 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Social Proof with Fomo typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Team typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (14 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Social Proof with Fomo and Team both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Social Proof with Fomo" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
