| Metric | Social Media Share & Follow | Social Feed |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 30 | ★ 650 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Social Media Share & Follow is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.9★ vs Social Feed's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Social Feed offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Social Media Share & Follow starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Social Feed has the larger user base (650 reviews vs 30), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Social Media Share & Follow's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Social Media Share & Follow; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Social Feed's 650-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Social Media Share & Follow's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Social Media Share & Follow audit • Social Feed audit
| Keyword | Social Media Share & Follow | Social Feed |
|---|---|---|
| grow social media | #7 | #3 |
| social media | #3 | #7 |
| social media followers | #7 | #3 |
| your social media | #81 | #3 |
| your social | #9 | #3 |
Social Feed is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Social Media Share & Follow starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Social Media Share & Follow has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 30 reviews) compared to Social Feed (4.0★ from 650 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Social Media Share & Follow fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Social Feed is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Social Feed has more onboarding documentation maturity (650 reviews vs 30), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Social Media Share & Follow typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (30 reviews). Social Feed aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (650 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Social Media Share & Follow and Social Feed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Social Media Share & Follow" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.