Site Count vs UTM Catcher

Based on the data on this page, UTM Catcher is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Site Count's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Site Count at Free plan available, UTM Catcher at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to UTM Catcher; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Site Count's 1-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than UTM Catcher's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Site Count or UTM Catcher cheaper?

Both Site Count and UTM Catcher offer paid plans only. Site Count starts at Free plan available; UTM Catcher starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Which has better reviews, Site Count or UTM Catcher?

UTM Catcher has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 16 reviews) compared to Site Count (1.0★ from 1 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Site Count or UTM Catcher?

UTM Catcher holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 1.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Site Count or UTM Catcher?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. UTM Catcher has the deeper published review base (16 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Site Count typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). UTM Catcher typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Site Count and UTM Catcher?

Migration support varies by app and category. Site Count and UTM Catcher both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Site Count" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.