Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Robot.txt Editor & Validator | Site Booster Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Robot.txt Editor & Validator | Site Booster Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.7 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 793 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | — | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 8 supported |
Site Booster Pro edges out Robot.txt Editor & Validator on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. Pricing entry tiers: Robot.txt Editor & Validator at Free, Site Booster Pro at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Site Booster Pro has the larger user base (793 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Robot.txt Editor & Validator 's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Site Booster Pro; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Robot.txt Editor & Validator 's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Site Booster Pro's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Robot.txt Editor & Validator audit • Site Booster Pro audit
| — |
| Keyword | Robot.txt Editor & Validator | Site Booster Pro |
|---|---|---|
| optimization | #44 | #18 |
Both Robot.txt Editor & Validator and Site Booster Pro offer paid plans only. Robot.txt Editor & Validator starts at Free; Site Booster Pro starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Site Booster Pro has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 793 reviews) compared to Robot.txt Editor & Validator (4.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Robot.txt Editor & Validator fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Site Booster Pro is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Site Booster Pro has more onboarding documentation maturity (793 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Robot.txt Editor & Validator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3 reviews). Site Booster Pro aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (793 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Robot.txt Editor & Validator and Site Booster Pro both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Robot.txt Editor & Validator " in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
