Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Buy Again & Repeat Orders | Request Quote & Hide Price | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Buy Again & Repeat Orders | Request Quote & Hide Price |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 3.4 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 15 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Buy Again & Repeat Orders is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Request Quote & Hide Price's 3.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Request Quote & Hide Price offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Buy Again & Repeat Orders starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Buy Again & Repeat Orders; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Request Quote & Hide Price's 15-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Buy Again & Repeat Orders's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Buy Again & Repeat Orders audit • Request Quote & Hide Price audit
| Keyword | Buy Again & Repeat Orders | Request Quote & Hide Price |
|---|---|---|
| request quote | Not ranked | #1 |
| request | Not ranked | #2 |
| submit | Not ranked | #8 |
| import orders | #9 | Not ranked |
| orders refunds | #9 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Request Quote & Hide Price is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Buy Again & Repeat Orders starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Buy Again & Repeat Orders has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Request Quote & Hide Price (3.4★ from 15 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Buy Again & Repeat Orders holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.4★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Request Quote & Hide Price has the deeper published review base (15 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Buy Again & Repeat Orders typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Request Quote & Hide Price typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (15 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Buy Again & Repeat Orders and Request Quote & Hide Price both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Buy Again & Repeat Orders" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
