Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Common Ninja Pricing Tables | Request For Quotation | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Common Ninja Pricing Tables | Request For Quotation |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.2 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 12 | 0 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Common Ninja Pricing Tables is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 2.2★ vs Request For Quotation's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Common Ninja Pricing Tables offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Request For Quotation starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Common Ninja Pricing Tables; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Request For Quotation's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Common Ninja Pricing Tables's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Common Ninja Pricing Tables audit • Request For Quotation audit
| Keyword | Common Ninja Pricing Tables | Request For Quotation |
|---|---|---|
| pricing | #7 | #28 |
Common Ninja Pricing Tables is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Request For Quotation starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Common Ninja Pricing Tables fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Request For Quotation is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Common Ninja Pricing Tables has more onboarding documentation maturity (12 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Common Ninja Pricing Tables typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (12 reviews). Request For Quotation aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Common Ninja Pricing Tables and Request For Quotation both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Request For Quotation" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
