Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| QB Desktop Sync by Webgility | Xero Bridge by Parex | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | QB Desktop Sync by Webgility | Xero Bridge by Parex |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.2 ★ |
| Total reviews | 14 | ★ 33 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, QB Desktop Sync by Webgility is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Xero Bridge by Parex's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: QB Desktop Sync by Webgility at Paid, Xero Bridge by Parex at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to QB Desktop Sync by Webgility; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Xero Bridge by Parex's 33-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than QB Desktop Sync by Webgility's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: QB Desktop Sync by Webgility audit • Xero Bridge by Parex audit
| Keyword | QB Desktop Sync by Webgility | Xero Bridge by Parex |
|---|---|---|
| accounting | #31 | #2 |
| countries by data | #29 | #10 |
| sync your contacts | #19 | #22 |
| sync contacts | #20 | #25 |
| import orders refunds | #48 | #9 |
Both QB Desktop Sync by Webgility and Xero Bridge by Parex offer paid plans only. QB Desktop Sync by Webgility starts at Paid; Xero Bridge by Parex starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
QB Desktop Sync by Webgility has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 14 reviews) compared to Xero Bridge by Parex (4.2★ from 33 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
QB Desktop Sync by Webgility holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Xero Bridge by Parex has the deeper published review base (33 vs 14), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
QB Desktop Sync by Webgility typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (14 reviews). Xero Bridge by Parex typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (33 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. QB Desktop Sync by Webgility and Xero Bridge by Parex both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from QB Desktop Sync by Webgility" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
