Loading content…
Cursor Lab vs Accessibility
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Cursor Lab | Accessibility | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Cursor Lab | Accessibility | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Cursor Lab | Accessibility |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 5 | 0 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 7 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Cursor Lab is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Accessibility's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Cursor Lab at Free plan available, Accessibility at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Cursor Lab; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Accessibility's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Cursor Lab's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Cursor Lab audit • Accessibility audit
| — |
| Keyword | Cursor Lab | Accessibility |
|---|---|---|
| cursor | #2 | Not ranked |
| website | #3 | Not ranked |
| design | #5 | Not ranked |
| accessibility | Not ranked | #7 |
| wcag eaa | Not ranked | #10 |
No tracked changes.
Both Cursor Lab and Accessibility offer paid plans only. Cursor Lab starts at Free plan available; Accessibility starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Cursor Lab holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Cursor Lab has the deeper published review base (5 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Cursor Lab typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). Accessibility typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Cursor Lab and Accessibility both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Accessibility" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.