Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LinkedIn Feed | External Links | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | LinkedIn Feed | External Links |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 1 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 2 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 7 supported |
Based on the data on this page, External Links is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs LinkedIn Feed's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, LinkedIn Feed offers a free tier (Free plan available) while External Links starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to External Links; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — LinkedIn Feed's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than External Links's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LinkedIn Feed audit • External Links audit
| — |
| Keyword | LinkedIn Feed | External Links |
|---|---|---|
| canonical links | #516 | #2016 |
| links tags | #5 | #2319 |
| canonical links tags | #5 | #2319 |
| links | #10 | #27 |
LinkedIn Feed is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). External Links starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
External Links holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. External Links has the deeper published review base (1 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
LinkedIn Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). External Links typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LinkedIn Feed and External Links both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LinkedIn Feed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
