Pixel Conversion Tracking vs UTM Catcher

Based on the data on this page, UTM Catcher is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Pixel Conversion Tracking's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, UTM Catcher offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Pixel Conversion Tracking starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to UTM Catcher; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pixel Conversion Tracking's 10-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than UTM Catcher's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Pixel Conversion Tracking or UTM Catcher cheaper?

UTM Catcher is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Pixel Conversion Tracking starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Pixel Conversion Tracking or UTM Catcher?

UTM Catcher has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 16 reviews) compared to Pixel Conversion Tracking (3.8★ from 10 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Pixel Conversion Tracking or UTM Catcher?

UTM Catcher holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Pixel Conversion Tracking or UTM Catcher?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. UTM Catcher has the deeper published review base (16 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Pixel Conversion Tracking typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). UTM Catcher typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Pixel Conversion Tracking and UTM Catcher?

Migration support varies by app and category. Pixel Conversion Tracking and UTM Catcher both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pixel Conversion Tracking" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.