| Metric | Photo Editor | Rollover Image Effects |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 160 | 94 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Photo Editor is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.7★ vs Rollover Image Effects's 4.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Photo Editor offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Rollover Image Effects starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Photo Editor has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 94), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Rollover Image Effects's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Photo Editor; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Rollover Image Effects's 94-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Photo Editor's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Photo Editor audit • Rollover Image Effects audit
| Keyword | Photo Editor | Rollover Image Effects |
|---|---|---|
| image | #7 | #10 |
| images | #7 | #10 |
| seasonal effects | #28 | #5 |
| snow effects | #28 | #5 |
| image comparison | #33 | #4 |
Photo Editor is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Rollover Image Effects starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Photo Editor has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 160 reviews) compared to Rollover Image Effects (4.0★ from 94 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Photo Editor fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Rollover Image Effects is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Photo Editor has more onboarding documentation maturity (160 reviews vs 94), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Photo Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (160 reviews). Rollover Image Effects aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (94 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Photo Editor and Rollover Image Effects both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Rollover Image Effects" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.