Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Magic Scroll | Photo Editor | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Magic Scroll | Photo Editor |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 160 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Magic Scroll is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Photo Editor's 4.7★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Magic Scroll at Free plan available, Photo Editor at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Photo Editor has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Magic Scroll's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Magic Scroll; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Photo Editor's 160-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Magic Scroll's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Magic Scroll audit • Photo Editor audit
| Keyword | Magic Scroll | Photo Editor |
|---|---|---|
| design | #13 | #48 |
| customizable design | #35 | #29 |
Both Magic Scroll and Photo Editor offer paid plans only. Magic Scroll starts at Free plan available; Photo Editor starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Magic Scroll has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Photo Editor (4.7★ from 160 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Magic Scroll fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Photo Editor is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Photo Editor has more onboarding documentation maturity (160 reviews vs 1), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Magic Scroll typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1 reviews). Photo Editor aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (160 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Magic Scroll and Photo Editor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Magic Scroll" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
