| Metric | WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty | PDF Viewer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.1 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.6k | 303 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 27 supported |
Based on the data on this page, WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs PDF Viewer Pro's 4.1★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty at Free plan available, PDF Viewer Pro at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty has the larger user base (1,570 reviews vs 303), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PDF Viewer Pro's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — PDF Viewer Pro's 303-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty audit • PDF Viewer Pro audit
| — |
| Keyword | WhatsApp & Chat Buttons | PDF Viewer Pro |
|---|---|---|
| size | #30 | #41 |
| size guides | #33 | #48 |
Both WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty and PDF Viewer Pro offer paid plans only. WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty starts at Free plan available; PDF Viewer Pro starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1,570 reviews) compared to PDF Viewer Pro (4.1★ from 303 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.1★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty has the deeper published review base (1,570 vs 303), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1,570 reviews). PDF Viewer Pro typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (303 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. WhatsApp & Chat Buttons: Chaty and PDF Viewer Pro both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PDF Viewer Pro" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.