Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Payment Icons Pro | Profy Announcement Bar Banners | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Payment Icons Pro | Profy Announcement Bar Banners |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 147 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | — | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 0 supported | 5 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Profy Announcement Bar Banners is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.8★ vs Payment Icons Pro's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Payment Icons Pro offers a free tier (Free) while Profy Announcement Bar Banners starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Profy Announcement Bar Banners has the larger user base (147 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Payment Icons Pro's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Profy Announcement Bar Banners; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Payment Icons Pro's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Profy Announcement Bar Banners's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Payment Icons Pro audit • Profy Announcement Bar Banners audit
| Keyword | Payment Icons Pro | Profy Announcement Bar Banners |
|---|---|---|
| announcement | Not ranked | #1 |
| cookie consent banner | Not ranked | #3 |
| payment icons | #4 | Not ranked |
| cookie banner | Not ranked | #5 |
| icons | #10 | Not ranked |
No tracked changes.
Payment Icons Pro is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Profy Announcement Bar Banners starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Profy Announcement Bar Banners holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Profy Announcement Bar Banners has the deeper published review base (147 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Payment Icons Pro typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Profy Announcement Bar Banners typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (147 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Payment Icons Pro and Profy Announcement Bar Banners both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Payment Icons Pro" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
