Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Online Payments by vcita | PayPal | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Online Payments by vcita | PayPal |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 213 | 10 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 10 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, PayPal is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Online Payments by vcita's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, PayPal offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Online Payments by vcita starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Online Payments by vcita has the larger user base (213 reviews vs 10), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. PayPal's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to PayPal; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Online Payments by vcita's 213-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than PayPal's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Online Payments by vcita audit • PayPal audit
| — |
| Keyword | Online Payments by vcita | PayPal |
|---|---|---|
| paypal | #9 | #4 |
| paypal payment button | #6 | #12 |
| accept paypal | #15 | #5 |
| paypal stripe | #14 | #6 |
| accept paypal payments | #8 | #14 |
PayPal is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Online Payments by vcita starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
PayPal has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 10 reviews) compared to Online Payments by vcita (3.8★ from 213 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
PayPal holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Online Payments by vcita has the deeper published review base (213 vs 10), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Online Payments by vcita typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (213 reviews). PayPal typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (10 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Online Payments by vcita and PayPal both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from PayPal" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
