Meta Balls vs Photo Editor

Based on the data on this page, Photo Editor is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.7★ vs Meta Balls's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Meta Balls at Free plan available, Photo Editor at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Photo Editor has the larger user base (160 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Meta Balls's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Photo Editor; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Meta Balls's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Photo Editor's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Meta Balls or Photo Editor cheaper?

Both Meta Balls and Photo Editor offer paid plans only. Meta Balls starts at Free plan available; Photo Editor starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose Meta Balls or Photo Editor?

Photo Editor holds the higher average rating (4.7★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Meta Balls or Photo Editor?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Photo Editor has the deeper published review base (160 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Meta Balls typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Photo Editor typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (160 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Meta Balls and Photo Editor?

Migration support varies by app and category. Meta Balls and Photo Editor both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Meta Balls" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.