Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| RUM | Real User Monitoring | UTM Catcher | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | RUM | Real User Monitoring | UTM Catcher |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 16 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, UTM Catcher is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs RUM | Real User Monitoring's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: RUM | Real User Monitoring at Free plan available, UTM Catcher at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to UTM Catcher; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — RUM | Real User Monitoring's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than UTM Catcher's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: RUM | Real User Monitoring audit • UTM Catcher audit
| Keyword | RUM | Real User Monitoring | UTM Catcher |
|---|---|---|
| capture utm parameters | Not ranked | #1 |
| tracking | Not ranked | #2 |
| tracked | Not ranked | #3 |
| nps user feedback | #4 | Not ranked |
| post-purchase nps user | #8 | Not ranked |
Both RUM | Real User Monitoring and UTM Catcher offer paid plans only. RUM | Real User Monitoring starts at Free plan available; UTM Catcher starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
UTM Catcher holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. UTM Catcher has the deeper published review base (16 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
RUM | Real User Monitoring typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). UTM Catcher typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (16 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. RUM | Real User Monitoring and UTM Catcher both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from RUM | Real User Monitoring" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
