Loading content…
| Metric | accessiBe: Web Accessibility | Magic: Password-less & SMS |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1 | ★ 43 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | ★ 4 | 3 |
| Languages | 26 supported | 49 supported |
accessiBe: Web Accessibility edges out Magic: Password-less & SMS on rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Magic: Password-less & SMS offers a free tier (Free plan available) while accessiBe: Web Accessibility starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to accessiBe: Web Accessibility; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Magic: Password-less & SMS's 43-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than accessiBe: Web Accessibility's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: accessiBe: Web Accessibility audit • Magic: Password-less & SMS audit
| Listed |
|---|
| — |
| — |
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | accessiBe | Magic |
|---|---|---|
| access | #11 | #29 |
| menu | #48 | #36 |
| menus | #48 | #36 |
Magic: Password-less & SMS is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). accessiBe: Web Accessibility starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
accessiBe: Web Accessibility has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Magic: Password-less & SMS (4.7★ from 43 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
accessiBe: Web Accessibility holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Magic: Password-less & SMS has the deeper published review base (43 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
accessiBe: Web Accessibility typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). Magic: Password-less & SMS typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (43 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. accessiBe: Web Accessibility and Magic: Password-less & SMS both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from accessiBe: Web Accessibility" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
