Loading content…
Lucky Wheel vs Smartbis
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Lucky Wheel | Smartbis | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — |
Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Lucky Wheel | Smartbis | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — |
| Metric | Lucky Wheel | Smartbis |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.3 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 48 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 6 supported | 4 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Lucky Wheel is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Smartbis's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: Lucky Wheel at Free plan available, Smartbis at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Lucky Wheel; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Smartbis's 48-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Lucky Wheel's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Lucky Wheel audit • Smartbis audit
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Lucky Wheel | Smartbis |
|---|---|---|
| loyalty | #18 | #5 |
| reward | #27 | #3 |
| loyalty program | #26 | #6 |
| coupons | #42 | #37 |
| coupon | #42 | #37 |
Both Lucky Wheel and Smartbis offer paid plans only. Lucky Wheel starts at Free plan available; Smartbis starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Lucky Wheel has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 3 reviews) compared to Smartbis (4.3★ from 48 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Lucky Wheel fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Smartbis is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Smartbis has more onboarding documentation maturity (48 reviews vs 3), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Lucky Wheel typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3 reviews). Smartbis aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (48 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Lucky Wheel and Smartbis both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Lucky Wheel" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.