Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Live Messenger | Whatsapp Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Live Messenger | Whatsapp Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 514 | 122 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 0 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Whatsapp Chat is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Live Messenger's 3.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Whatsapp Chat offers a free tier (Free) while Live Messenger starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Live Messenger has the larger user base (514 reviews vs 122), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Whatsapp Chat's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Whatsapp Chat; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Live Messenger's 514-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Whatsapp Chat's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Live Messenger audit • Whatsapp Chat audit
| Keyword | Live Messenger | Whatsapp Chat |
|---|---|---|
| whatsapp facebook messenger | #12 | #9 |
| live chat | #20 | #15 |
| questions | #40 | #33 |
| instant website speed | #48 | #31 |
No tracked changes.
Whatsapp Chat is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free). Live Messenger starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Whatsapp Chat has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 122 reviews) compared to Live Messenger (3.6★ from 514 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Whatsapp Chat holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 3.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Live Messenger has the deeper published review base (514 vs 122), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Live Messenger typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (514 reviews). Whatsapp Chat typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (122 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Live Messenger and Whatsapp Chat both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Whatsapp Chat" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
