Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LinkedIn Button | Live Chat & AI Chatbot | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LinkedIn Button: Ichonic | Live Chat & AI Chatbot |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 5.0 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 11 | 8 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, LinkedIn Button: Ichonic is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Live Chat & AI Chatbot's 4.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. Pricing entry tiers: LinkedIn Button: Ichonic at Paid, Live Chat & AI Chatbot at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (apps, orders, integrations) varies. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to LinkedIn Button: Ichonic; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Live Chat & AI Chatbot's 8-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LinkedIn Button: Ichonic's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LinkedIn Button: Ichonic audit • Live Chat & AI Chatbot audit
| Keyword | LinkedIn Button | Live Chat & AI Chatbot |
|---|---|---|
| chat | #36 | #38 |
| chat buttons | #46 | #48 |
| chat button | #47 | #48 |
| whatsapp chat button | #47 | #48 |
Both LinkedIn Button: Ichonic and Live Chat & AI Chatbot offer paid plans only. LinkedIn Button: Ichonic starts at Paid; Live Chat & AI Chatbot starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
LinkedIn Button: Ichonic has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 11 reviews) compared to Live Chat & AI Chatbot (4.5★ from 8 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LinkedIn Button: Ichonic fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Live Chat & AI Chatbot is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. LinkedIn Button: Ichonic has more onboarding documentation maturity (11 reviews vs 8), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LinkedIn Button: Ichonic typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (11 reviews). Live Chat & AI Chatbot aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (8 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LinkedIn Button: Ichonic and Live Chat & AI Chatbot both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Live Chat & AI Chatbot" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
