Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic | Table Master | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic | Table Master |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 2.6 ★ |
| Total reviews | 779 | ★ 780 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.9★ vs Table Master's 2.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Table Master starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Table Master's 780-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic audit • Table Master audit
| Keyword | Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic | Table Master |
|---|---|---|
| track ads | #1 | Not ranked |
| track ads facebook | #1 | Not ranked |
| links tags | #1 | Not ranked |
| sheets table | Not ranked | #2 |
| price table | Not ranked | #2 |
No tracked changes.
Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Table Master starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 779 reviews) compared to Table Master (2.6★ from 780 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Table Master is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Table Master has more onboarding documentation maturity (780 reviews vs 779), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (779 reviews). Table Master aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (780 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic and Table Master both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Ads & Links 4U - Get Traffic" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
