Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Google Reviews & SEO Booster | Robot.txt Editor & Validator | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Google Reviews & SEO Booster | Robot.txt Editor & Validator |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 802 | 3 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Google Reviews & SEO Booster edges out Robot.txt Editor & Validator on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
Pricing entry tiers: Google Reviews & SEO Booster at Free plan available, Robot.txt Editor & Validator at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Google Reviews & SEO Booster has the larger user base (802 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Robot.txt Editor & Validator's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Google Reviews & SEO Booster; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Robot.txt Editor & Validator's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Google Reviews & SEO Booster's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google Reviews & SEO Booster audit • Robot.txt Editor & Validator audit
| Keyword | Google Reviews & SEO Booster | Robot.txt Editor & Validator |
|---|---|---|
| important | #7 | #36 |
| optimization | #28 | #48 |
Both Google Reviews & SEO Booster and Robot.txt Editor & Validator offer paid plans only. Google Reviews & SEO Booster starts at Free plan available; Robot.txt Editor & Validator starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Google Reviews & SEO Booster has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 802 reviews) compared to Robot.txt Editor & Validator (4.7★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Google Reviews & SEO Booster holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Google Reviews & SEO Booster has the deeper published review base (802 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google Reviews & SEO Booster typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (802 reviews). Robot.txt Editor & Validator typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google Reviews & SEO Booster and Robot.txt Editor & Validator both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Robot.txt Editor & Validator" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
