Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| LinkedIn Feed | Social Media Icons | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | LinkedIn Feed | Social Media Icons |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.7 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 51 | ★ 605 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
LinkedIn Feed edges out Social Media Icons on rating (4.7★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. On pricing, Social Media Icons offers a free tier (Free plan available) while LinkedIn Feed starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly for stores at sub-1K monthly orders where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered. Social Media Icons has the larger user base (605 reviews vs 51), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. LinkedIn Feed's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to LinkedIn Feed; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Social Media Icons's 605-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than LinkedIn Feed's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: LinkedIn Feed audit • Social Media Icons audit
| Keyword | LinkedIn Feed | Social Media Icons |
|---|---|---|
| feed grow social | #9 | #3 |
| social | #13 | #1 |
| social media | #40 | #1 |
| canonical links | #6 | #35 |
| grow social media | #41 | #2 |
Social Media Icons is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). LinkedIn Feed starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
LinkedIn Feed has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 51 reviews) compared to Social Media Icons (4.5★ from 605 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. LinkedIn Feed fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Social Media Icons is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Social Media Icons has more onboarding documentation maturity (605 reviews vs 51), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
LinkedIn Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (51 reviews). Social Media Icons aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (605 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. LinkedIn Feed and Social Media Icons both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LinkedIn Feed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
