Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Like Button Rating | Youtube Subscribe | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Like Button Rating | Youtube Subscribe |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.4 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 44 | 2 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 0 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Youtube Subscribe is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 5.0★ vs Like Button Rating's 2.4★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Like Button Rating offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Youtube Subscribe starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Youtube Subscribe; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Like Button Rating's 44-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Youtube Subscribe's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Like Button Rating audit • Youtube Subscribe audit
| Keyword | Like Button Rating | Youtube Subscribe |
|---|---|---|
| ratings | #8 | Not ranked |
| follow | Not ranked | #9 |
| buttons | #14 | Not ranked |
| button | #14 | Not ranked |
| follow us | Not ranked | #22 |
Like Button Rating is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Youtube Subscribe starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Youtube Subscribe has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Like Button Rating (2.4★ from 44 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Like Button Rating fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; Youtube Subscribe is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Like Button Rating has more onboarding documentation maturity (44 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Like Button Rating typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (44 reviews). Youtube Subscribe aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Like Button Rating and Youtube Subscribe both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Youtube Subscribe" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
