Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Floating Icons | Social Feed | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Floating Icons | Social Feed |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | — | 4.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 0 | 651 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 1 tier | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Social Feed is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.0★ vs Floating Icons's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Social Feed offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Floating Icons starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Social Feed has the larger user base (651 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Floating Icons's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Social Feed; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Floating Icons's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Social Feed's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Floating Icons audit • Social Feed audit
| Keyword | Floating Icons | Social Feed |
|---|---|---|
| media | #37 | #2 |
No tracked changes.
Social Feed is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Floating Icons starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Social Feed holds the higher average rating (4.0★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Social Feed has the deeper published review base (651 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Floating Icons typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). Social Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (651 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Floating Icons and Social Feed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Floating Icons" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
