Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) | UpAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) | UpAI: Better Domain Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 1.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 22 | 2 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 49 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.8★ vs UpAI: Better Domain Rating's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) at Free plan available, UpAI: Better Domain Rating at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD); mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — UpAI: Better Domain Rating's 2-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD)'s broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) audit • UpAI: Better Domain Rating audit
| — |
| Keyword | Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) | UpAI |
|---|---|---|
| listings | #26 | #39 |
| ratings | #48 | #18 |
Both Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) and UpAI: Better Domain Rating offer paid plans only. Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) starts at Free plan available; UpAI: Better Domain Rating starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 22 reviews) compared to UpAI: Better Domain Rating (1.0★ from 2 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 1.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) has the deeper published review base (22 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (22 reviews). UpAI: Better Domain Rating typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Schema | Google SEO (JSON-LD) and UpAI: Better Domain Rating both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from UpAI: Better Domain Rating" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
