| Metric | Instagrams | LinkedIn Feed |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 487 | 59 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | 2 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | 3 |
| Languages | 7 supported | 1 supported |
Instagrams edges out LinkedIn Feed on rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Instagrams offers a free tier (Free plan available) while LinkedIn Feed starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Instagrams has the larger user base (487 reviews vs 59), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. LinkedIn Feed's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Instagrams; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — LinkedIn Feed's 59-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Instagrams's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Instagrams audit • LinkedIn Feed audit
| — |
| Keyword | Instagrams | LinkedIn Feed |
|---|---|---|
| social | #5 | #15 |
| instagram feed | #9 | #19 |
| links tags | #35 | #6 |
| canonical links tags | #35 | #6 |
| social media followers | #31 | #47 |
Instagrams is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). LinkedIn Feed starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Instagrams has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 487 reviews) compared to LinkedIn Feed (4.7★ from 59 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Instagrams holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 4.7★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Instagrams has the deeper published review base (487 vs 59), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Instagrams typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (487 reviews). LinkedIn Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (59 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Instagrams and LinkedIn Feed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from LinkedIn Feed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.