Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Instagram Feed Social | Pinterest Embed | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Instagram Feed Social | Pinterest Embed |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 456 | 0 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 16 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Instagram Feed Social is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.5★ vs Pinterest Embed's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Instagram Feed Social offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Pinterest Embed starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Instagram Feed Social has the larger user base (456 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Pinterest Embed's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Instagram Feed Social; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Pinterest Embed's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Instagram Feed Social's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Instagram Feed Social audit • Pinterest Embed audit
| — |
| Keyword | Instagram Feed Social | Pinterest Embed |
|---|---|---|
| social | #2 | Not ranked |
| feed grow social | #3 | Not ranked |
| your social media | #4 | Not ranked |
| board | Not ranked | #9 |
| Not ranked | #11 |
No tracked changes.
Instagram Feed Social is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Pinterest Embed starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Instagram Feed Social holds the higher average rating (4.5★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Instagram Feed Social has the deeper published review base (456 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Instagram Feed Social typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (456 reviews). Pinterest Embed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Instagram Feed Social and Pinterest Embed both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Pinterest Embed" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
