| Metric | Instafeed + Stories | Social Media Icons |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.8 ★ | 4.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | 103 | ★ 605 |
| Free plan | — | ★ Yes |
| Pricing | Paid | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Instafeed + Stories edges out Social Media Icons on rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.
On pricing, Social Media Icons offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Instafeed + Stories starts at Paid. The free option meaningfully reduces evaluation cost, particularly at low usage volumes where the entry-paid tier can outpace the value delivered.
Social Media Icons has the larger user base (605 reviews vs 103), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Instafeed + Stories's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Instafeed + Stories; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Social Media Icons's 605-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Instafeed + Stories's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Instafeed + Stories audit • Social Media Icons audit
| Keyword | Instafeed + Stories | Social Media Icons |
|---|---|---|
| #12 | #3 | |
| social | #15 | #1 |
| #12 | #9 | |
| locations in | #32 | #8 |
| in minutes | #33 | #8 |
Social Media Icons is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Instafeed + Stories starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Instafeed + Stories has the higher average rating (4.8★ from 103 reviews) compared to Social Media Icons (4.5★ from 605 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Instafeed + Stories holds the higher average rating (4.8★ vs 4.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Social Media Icons has the deeper published review base (605 vs 103), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Instafeed + Stories typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (103 reviews). Social Media Icons typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (605 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Instafeed + Stories and Social Media Icons both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Instafeed + Stories" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.