Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Impressive Hover Effects | Slider Magic | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Impressive Hover Effects | Slider Magic |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 ★ | — |
| Total reviews | 148 | 0 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Impressive Hover Effects is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.2★ vs Slider Magic's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Impressive Hover Effects offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Slider Magic starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Impressive Hover Effects has the larger user base (148 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Slider Magic's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Impressive Hover Effects; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Slider Magic's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Impressive Hover Effects's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Impressive Hover Effects audit • Slider Magic audit
| Keyword | Impressive Hover Effects | Slider Magic |
|---|---|---|
| effects | #2 | Not ranked |
| button | #4 | Not ranked |
| buttons | #4 | Not ranked |
| magic | Not ranked | #6 |
| dynamic | Not ranked | #14 |
Impressive Hover Effects is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Slider Magic starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Impressive Hover Effects fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Slider Magic is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Impressive Hover Effects has more onboarding documentation maturity (148 reviews vs 0), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Impressive Hover Effects typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (148 reviews). Slider Magic aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (0 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Impressive Hover Effects and Slider Magic both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Slider Magic" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
