Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Text Slider Builder | QuickBooks Connector | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated |
| Metric | Text Slider Builder | QuickBooks Connector |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 ★ | ★ 4.7 ★ |
| Total reviews | 1.4k | ★ 1.4k |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 8 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, QuickBooks Connector is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.7★ vs Text Slider Builder's 4.3★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Text Slider Builder offers a free tier (Free plan available) while QuickBooks Connector starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to QuickBooks Connector; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Text Slider Builder's 1,403-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than QuickBooks Connector's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Text Slider Builder audit • QuickBooks Connector audit
| — |
| Keyword | Text Slider Builder | QuickBooks Connector |
|---|---|---|
| your landing pages | #29 | #27 |
| follow | #34 | #33 |
| under construction page | #46 | #43 |
| coming soon page | #46 | #44 |
| soon page | #47 | #44 |
Text Slider Builder is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). QuickBooks Connector starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
QuickBooks Connector has the higher average rating (4.7★ from 1,417 reviews) compared to Text Slider Builder (4.3★ from 1,403 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Text Slider Builder fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; QuickBooks Connector is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. QuickBooks Connector has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,417 reviews vs 1,403), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Text Slider Builder typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,403 reviews). QuickBooks Connector aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (1,417 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Text Slider Builder and QuickBooks Connector both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Text Slider Builder" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
