Loading content…
| Metric | Gallery: Impressive Slideshow | Job |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.2 ★ | 3.8 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 1.6k | 18 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 2 tiers | ★ 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 8 supported | 6 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Gallery: Impressive Slideshow is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market merchants — 4.2★ vs Job's 3.8★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base. On pricing, Gallery: Impressive Slideshow offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Job starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Gallery: Impressive Slideshow has the larger user base (1,590 reviews vs 18), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Job's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to Gallery: Impressive Slideshow; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Job's 18-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Gallery: Impressive Slideshow's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Gallery: Impressive Slideshow audit • Job audit
| Listed | — | — |
|---|
| Last updated | — | — |
|---|
| Keyword | Gallery | Job |
|---|---|---|
| templates | #9 | #21 |
| mailing list | #42 | #8 |
| under construction page | #44 | #43 |
| coming soon page | #45 | #43 |
| soon page | #46 | #44 |
Gallery: Impressive Slideshow is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Job starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Gallery: Impressive Slideshow has the higher average rating (4.2★ from 1,590 reviews) compared to Job (3.8★ from 18 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Gallery: Impressive Slideshow fits better if you prioritize rating consistency; Job is the call if you need the larger user base. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Gallery: Impressive Slideshow has more onboarding documentation maturity (1,590 reviews vs 18), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Gallery: Impressive Slideshow typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (1,590 reviews). Job aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (18 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Gallery: Impressive Slideshow and Job both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Job" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
