Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Image Zoom | Salesdish Images Falling | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — |
| Metric | Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover | Salesdish Images Falling |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 1.0 ★ | ★ 4.9 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 82 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Free |
| Pricing tiers | 3 tiers | — |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Languages | 49 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Salesdish Images Falling is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.9★ vs Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover's 1.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover at Free plan available, Salesdish Images Falling at Free. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Salesdish Images Falling; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover's 3-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Salesdish Images Falling's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover audit • Salesdish Images Falling audit
| Keyword | Image Zoom | Salesdish Images Falling |
|---|---|---|
| image zoom | #10 | #7 |
| image comparison | #19 | #6 |
| image optimizer | #21 | #10 |
| image effects | #31 | #6 |
| image | #40 | #11 |
No tracked changes.
Both Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover and Salesdish Images Falling offer paid plans only. Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover starts at Free plan available; Salesdish Images Falling starts at Free. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Salesdish Images Falling has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 82 reviews) compared to Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover (1.0★ from 3 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Salesdish Images Falling holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 1.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Salesdish Images Falling has the deeper published review base (82 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Salesdish Images Falling typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (82 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover and Salesdish Images Falling both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Image Zoom: Enlarge on Hover" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
