RUM - Real User Monitoring vs Hit Counter

Based on the data on this page, RUM - Real User Monitoring is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Hit Counter's 4.2★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

On pricing, Hit Counter offers a free tier (Free plan available) while RUM - Real User Monitoring starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

Hit Counter has the larger user base (254 reviews vs 1), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. RUM - Real User Monitoring's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to RUM - Real User Monitoring; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Hit Counter's 254-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than RUM - Real User Monitoring's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Hit Counter or RUM - Real User Monitoring cheaper?

Hit Counter is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). RUM - Real User Monitoring starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Hit Counter or RUM - Real User Monitoring?

RUM - Real User Monitoring has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 1 reviews) compared to Hit Counter (4.2★ from 254 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Hit Counter or RUM - Real User Monitoring?

RUM - Real User Monitoring holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.2★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Hit Counter or RUM - Real User Monitoring?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Hit Counter has the deeper published review base (254 vs 1), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Hit Counter typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (254 reviews). RUM - Real User Monitoring typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (1 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Hit Counter and RUM - Real User Monitoring?

Migration support varies by app and category. Hit Counter and RUM - Real User Monitoring both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from RUM - Real User Monitoring" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.