RUM | Real User Monitoring vs Hit Counter

Based on the data on this page, Hit Counter is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.2★ vs RUM | Real User Monitoring's 0.0★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.

Pricing entry tiers: Hit Counter at Free plan available, RUM | Real User Monitoring at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.

Hit Counter has the larger user base (254 reviews vs 0), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. RUM | Real User Monitoring's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Hit Counter; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — RUM | Real User Monitoring's 0-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Hit Counter's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Hit Counter or RUM | Real User Monitoring cheaper?

Both Hit Counter and RUM | Real User Monitoring offer paid plans only. Hit Counter starts at Free plan available; RUM | Real User Monitoring starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.

Should I choose Hit Counter or RUM | Real User Monitoring?

Hit Counter holds the higher average rating (4.2★ vs 0.0★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Hit Counter or RUM | Real User Monitoring?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Hit Counter has the deeper published review base (254 vs 0), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Hit Counter typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (254 reviews). RUM | Real User Monitoring typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (0 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Hit Counter and RUM | Real User Monitoring?

Migration support varies by app and category. Hit Counter and RUM | Real User Monitoring both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from RUM | Real User Monitoring" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.