Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Google Reviews | GPT Sales Agent | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Google Reviews | GPT Sales Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.8 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 3.4k | 2 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Built for Shopify | — | — |
| Pricing tiers | 4 tiers | 4 tiers |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
GPT Sales Agent edges out Google Reviews on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number. On pricing, Google Reviews offers a free tier (Free plan available) while GPT Sales Agent starts at Paid. For early-stage stores or merchants validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real orders before committing budget. Google Reviews has the larger user base (3,417 reviews vs 2), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. GPT Sales Agent's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat. Recommended by store size: small/early-stage merchants who need fast install and low risk should default to GPT Sales Agent; mid-market and enterprise merchants with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Reviews's 3,417-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than GPT Sales Agent's broader-but-shallower coverage. This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google Reviews audit • GPT Sales Agent audit
| Keyword | Google Reviews | GPT Sales Agent |
|---|---|---|
| drive sales | #25 | #15 |
| boost sales | #34 | #21 |
No tracked changes.
Google Reviews is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). GPT Sales Agent starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market marketplace; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
GPT Sales Agent has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Google Reviews (4.8★ from 3,417 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
It depends on what you're optimizing for. Google Reviews fits better if you prioritize broader integrations; GPT Sales Agent is the call if you need the higher-rated option. Read both apps' detail pages on AppRanks for the full feature breakdown, install counts, and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market marketplace. Google Reviews has more onboarding documentation maturity (3,417 reviews vs 2), which usually translates to better-tested setup wizards and quicker time-to-value. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly — read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for merchant-reported install experience.
Google Reviews typically suits early-stage and growth-mode stores based on its review-base composition (3,417 reviews). GPT Sales Agent aligns more with early-stage and growth-mode stores (2 reviews). Larger review bases generally mean the app has been load-tested at scale — relevant if you're processing high order volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google Reviews and GPT Sales Agent both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from GPT Sales Agent" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
