Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Google Reviews Slider & Feed | Reviews Page | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Google Reviews Slider & Feed | Reviews Page |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.6 ★ | ★ 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 316 | 5 |
| Free plan | — | — |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 3 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Reviews Page is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 5.0★ vs Google Reviews Slider & Feed's 4.6★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
Pricing entry tiers: Google Reviews Slider & Feed at Paid, Reviews Page at Paid. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Google Reviews Slider & Feed has the larger user base (316 reviews vs 5), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Reviews Page's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Reviews Page; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Google Reviews Slider & Feed's 316-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Reviews Page's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google Reviews Slider & Feed audit • Reviews Page audit
| Keyword | Google Reviews Slider & Feed | Reviews Page |
|---|---|---|
| customer reviews | #9 | #28 |
| reviews testimonials | #7 | #37 |
| testimonials | #8 | #36 |
| import existing reviews | #9 | #37 |
| google reviews slider | #1 | #46 |
Both Google Reviews Slider & Feed and Reviews Page offer paid plans only. Google Reviews Slider & Feed starts at Paid; Reviews Page starts at Paid. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Reviews Page has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 5 reviews) compared to Google Reviews Slider & Feed (4.6★ from 316 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Reviews Page holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.6★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Google Reviews Slider & Feed has the deeper published review base (316 vs 5), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google Reviews Slider & Feed typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (316 reviews). Reviews Page typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (5 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google Reviews Slider & Feed and Reviews Page both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Reviews Page" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
