Side-by-side comparison · 24 data points
| Google PageSpeed Insights | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Google PageSpeed Insights | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 5.0 ★ | 5.0 ★ |
| Total reviews | 3 | ★ 122 |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Pricing | Free | Free plan available |
| Pricing tiers | — | 3 tiers |
| Listed features | 4 | 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Google PageSpeed Insights and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer are evenly matched on rating (5.0★ vs 5.0★) — the differentiator comes down to pricing fit, feature breadth, and which app's interaction pattern suits your team's workflow.
Pricing entry tiers: Google PageSpeed Insights at Free, Automatic SEO Tags Fixer at Free plan available. Check each app's tier structure for the capacity limits you actually need before deciding — the headline number is the same shape, but the gating shape per tier (seats, usage volume, integrations) varies.
Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the larger user base (122 reviews vs 3), which usually maps to broader integration coverage, faster bug-fix cadence, and a deeper bench of community workflow patterns. Google PageSpeed Insights's smaller cohort can be an advantage for niche workflows where the bigger app has accumulated bloat.
Recommended evaluation path: install both apps' free tiers (where available) and run them in parallel on a small cohort for 7-14 days before committing. The data tables below show the per-feature breakdown — for most site owners the deciding factor will be a single integration or workflow detail that's hard to compare from listing pages alone.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Google PageSpeed Insights audit • Automatic SEO Tags Fixer audit
| Keyword | Google PageSpeed Insights | Automatic SEO Tags Fixer |
|---|---|---|
| mobile | #25 | #24 |
| issues | #38 | #13 |
| boost your seo | #48 | #5 |
| boost traffic | #21 | #33 |
| google tag manager | #40 | #17 |
Both Google PageSpeed Insights and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer offer paid plans only. Google PageSpeed Insights starts at Free; Automatic SEO Tags Fixer starts at Free plan available. Compare the per-tier features in the Pricing section above before committing.
Google PageSpeed Insights (5.0★, 3 reviews) and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer (5.0★, 122 reviews) are essentially tied on rating. Look at review velocity and individual reviewer quotes — both visible on each app's detail page — to differentiate.
AppRanks cannot separate these two on rating — both sit at 5.0★. Automatic SEO Tags Fixer does carry the larger published review base (122 vs 3). Read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Automatic SEO Tags Fixer has the deeper published review base (122 vs 3), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Google PageSpeed Insights typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (3 reviews). Automatic SEO Tags Fixer typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (122 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Google PageSpeed Insights and Automatic SEO Tags Fixer both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Google PageSpeed Insights" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.
