Forward vs Youtube Subscribe

Youtube Subscribe edges out Forward: Share current page on rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★), but the gap is small enough that pricing fit and feature differentiation should drive the decision more than the headline number.

On pricing, Forward: Share current page offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Youtube Subscribe starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.

Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Youtube Subscribe; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Forward: Share current page's 74-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Youtube Subscribe's broader-but-shallower coverage.

This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.

Is Forward: Share current page or Youtube Subscribe cheaper?

Forward: Share current page is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Youtube Subscribe starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.

Which has better reviews, Forward: Share current page or Youtube Subscribe?

Youtube Subscribe has the higher average rating (5.0★ from 2 reviews) compared to Forward: Share current page (4.8★ from 74 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.

Should I choose Forward: Share current page or Youtube Subscribe?

Youtube Subscribe holds the higher average rating (5.0★ vs 4.8★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.

Which is faster to set up, Forward: Share current page or Youtube Subscribe?

Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Forward: Share current page has the deeper published review base (74 vs 2), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.

Which works better for small vs large Wix App Market site owners?

Forward: Share current page typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (74 reviews). Youtube Subscribe typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (2 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.

Can I migrate data between Forward: Share current page and Youtube Subscribe?

Migration support varies by app and category. Forward: Share current page and Youtube Subscribe both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Youtube Subscribe" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.