Loading content…
1. Listing metadata
Field-level data| Dividers | Footer Templates | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Dividers | Footer Templates | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | ||
| Description | ||
| Screenshots | images | images |
| Languages | ||
| Platforms | ||
| Developer | ||
| Listed | — | — |
| Last updated | — | — |
| Metric | Dividers: Animated & Stunning | Footer Templates |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | ★ 4.9 ★ | 1.5 ★ |
| Total reviews | ★ 40 | 11 |
| Free plan | ★ Yes | — |
| Pricing | Free plan available | Paid |
| Pricing tiers | ★ 4 tiers | 1 tier |
| Listed features | 3 | ★ 4 |
| Languages | 1 supported | 1 supported |
Based on the data on this page, Dividers: Animated & Stunning is the stronger choice for most Wix App Market site owners — 4.9★ vs Footer Templates's 1.5★ is a meaningful gap that usually reflects real product or support quality differences across the user base.
On pricing, Dividers: Animated & Stunning offers a free tier (Free plan available) while Footer Templates starts at Paid. For early-stage teams validating fit, the free-tier path lets you run the app on real workloads before committing budget.
Recommended by size: small/early-stage site owners who need fast install and low risk should default to Dividers: Animated & Stunning; mid-market and enterprise site owners with specific feature requirements should evaluate both — Footer Templates's 11-review base may include the workflow context that matches your specific use case better than Dividers: Animated & Stunning's broader-but-shallower coverage.
This verdict is generated from the live marketplace data on this page — rating, review count, pricing tier, and category position all refresh from the canonical Wix App Market listing every 24 hours. AppRanks does not accept payment to influence comparison outcomes; the methodology is documented on the About page and applies identically to every pair on the site.
Read each app's audit: Dividers: Animated & Stunning audit • Footer Templates audit
| Keyword | Dividers | Footer Templates |
|---|---|---|
| section | #1 | #18 |
| templates | #25 | #1 |
| faq section | #19 | #36 |
Dividers: Animated & Stunning is the cheaper option — it offers a free plan (Free plan available). Footer Templates starts at Paid. Both publish their pricing on the Wix App Market; AppRanks mirrors what's listed on each refresh cycle.
Dividers: Animated & Stunning has the higher average rating (4.9★ from 40 reviews) compared to Footer Templates (1.5★ from 11 reviews). Both are tracked daily by AppRanks, so the figures here update each refresh cycle.
Dividers: Animated & Stunning holds the higher average rating (4.9★ vs 1.5★). That is the one dimension AppRanks can separate them on here — read both apps' detail pages for the feature breakdown and recent listing changes.
Both apps are one-click installs from the Wix App Market. Dividers: Animated & Stunning has the deeper published review base (40 vs 11), which often — though not always — accompanies better-tested setup docs. AppRanks doesn't measure setup time directly: read the recent reviews on each app's detail page for user-reported install experience.
Dividers: Animated & Stunning typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (40 reviews). Footer Templates typically suits early-stage and growth-mode teams based on its published review base (11 reviews). A larger review base generally means the app has been exercised at scale — relevant if you are processing high volume or handling enterprise compliance requirements.
Migration support varies by app and category. Dividers: Animated & Stunning and Footer Templates both publish their export options on their marketplace listing pages (or in their support docs); some apps offer one-click import from competitors, others require CSV. The fastest check: search "import from Footer Templates" in each app's help center. AppRanks does not track migration tooling directly — this is a category-specific capability worth verifying before commitment.